Relevance AI
Relevance AI
Relevance AIvs

Relevance AI vs Claude Managed Agents

Claude Managed Agents are engineer-built, Claude-only agents Anthropic hosts. Relevance AI lets business teams run their own agents on any model, across every team.

Which platform fits your team

Both are good tools. The right one depends on the shape of your work.

Claude Managed Agents

Server-hosted agents built and run by engineers through Anthropic’s API, SDK, and CLI, powered by Claude’s frontier models.

  • Your engineers build agents in code and want to stay in the API, SDK, and CLI.

  • You are standardizing on Claude models and want Anthropic to host the runtime.

  • You want low-level control over the agent loop more than a business-owned workforce.

Relevance AI

An AI workforce business teams run themselves: specialist agents on any model, across operations, support, sales, and finance.

  • The team that owns the work should run its own agents, without an engineer in the loop.

  • You want to route each agent to the best model, Claude included, not one provider.

  • You need deep multi-agent orchestration across operations, support, sales, and finance.

Where Relevance AI is different

GPT-5.297%
Gemini 3 Flash96%
Kimi K381%
Coordinator
ResearchScored
DraftRouted

Business teams, not just engineers

Claude’s agents are built and run by engineers in the API. Relevance lets the team that owns the work run its own agents.

Any model, not Claude only

Claude Managed Agents run Claude models only, with no third-party routing. Relevance sends each agent to the best model for the job, Claude included.

Deep orchestration, not one coordinator

Claude’s coordinator delegates a single level. Relevance orchestrates nested multi-agent workflows, with agents delegating to agents.

Run by your ops team, not wired up by engineers

A vendor renewal a business ops team owns end to end: the agent reads the contract, weighs real usage against hiring plans, and escalates the one call it should not make alone, no engineer wiring required.

Renewal due in 30 days · Zendesk, 120 seats
Ops Coordinator

Zendesk renews in 30 days. Reviewing the contract and real seat usage before it auto-renews, and flagging anything the ops lead should decide.

Reading the contract: seats, term, auto-renew clause3s

The auto-renew clause needs 60 days notice to change seat count. We are inside 30 days, so a change this cycle may not be allowed. Holding that as an open question.

Pulling active-seat counts from the ops tracker4s

We pay for 120 seats but only 74 logged in this quarter. On usage alone we could drop 46.

Checking next-quarter headcount with the ops lead2s

Support is hiring 15 people next quarter, so cutting to 74 would leave us short mid-term. Right-sizing to 95, not 74.

Confirming the current per-seat list price5s
Zendesk is reviewed: 74 of 120 seats are active, and with support hiring 15 next quarter I’d right-size to 95, not the bare 74. One thing I will not decide alone: the contract needs 60 days notice to change seats and we are inside 30, so I escalated the notice window to the ops lead with the recommendation ready to send the moment they confirm.

How the platforms compare

Both put agents into production. The difference is who runs them and on what: Claude Managed Agents are wired up by engineers on Claude models, while Relevance AI is an AI workforce business teams run themselves on any model.

Relevance AI
Claude Managed Agents
Relevance AI
Claude Managed Agents
Who manages agents day-to-day?
Your ops and revenue teams — the people closest to the work. We have dashboards and tooling designed specifically for agent management.
Your engineers — agents are configured via API, SDK, or CLI. The Claude Console adds GUI tracing and admin controls.
Who manages agents day-to-day?
Your ops and revenue teams — the people closest to the work. We have dashboards and tooling designed specifically for agent management.
Your engineers — agents are configured via API, SDK, or CLI. The Claude Console adds GUI tracing and admin controls.
Who owns agent quality?
Domain experts, with pre-deployment scenarios, production checks, and monitoring they can manage themselves.
Your engineers, via runtime self-healing (Outcomes) plus a Console eval tool for pre-deployment prompt testing.
Who owns agent quality?
Domain experts, with pre-deployment scenarios, production checks, and monitoring they can manage themselves.
Your engineers, via runtime self-healing (Outcomes) plus a Console eval tool for pre-deployment prompt testing.
How do agents receive tasks?
Native triggers for CRMs, email, calendar, and more. Plus webhooks, cron, and the ability to build custom triggers in platform.
Native scheduled deployments (cron) and webhooks, plus on-demand runs — all in beta.
How do agents receive tasks?
Native triggers for CRMs, email, calendar, and more. Plus webhooks, cron, and the ability to build custom triggers in platform.
Native scheduled deployments (cron) and webhooks, plus on-demand runs — all in beta.
What can my agents access?
1,000+ native connectors plus MCP support and the ability to build custom connectors.
Built-in hosted tools (web, code, files) plus MCP and Anthropic’s Connectors Directory — MCP-based, not native connectors.
What can my agents access?
1,000+ native connectors plus MCP support and the ability to build custom connectors.
Built-in hosted tools (web, code, files) plus MCP and Anthropic’s Connectors Directory — MCP-based, not native connectors.
How much can I tune performance?
Full orchestration with parallel streams, deep nesting, evals, and production monitoring — all GA.
Strong model quality, but single-level orchestration: a coordinator delegating to up to 20 agents, no nested sub-delegation.
How much can I tune performance?
Full orchestration with parallel streams, deep nesting, evals, and production monitoring — all GA.
Strong model quality, but single-level orchestration: a coordinator delegating to up to 20 agents, no nested sub-delegation.
How much can I control cost?
Full. Route to any model provider and optimize cost per agent, per task.
Claude models only — no routing to third-party providers. You can down-tier within the Claude family (Haiku vs Opus).
How much can I control cost?
Full. Route to any model provider and optimize cost per agent, per task.
Claude models only — no routing to third-party providers. You can down-tier within the Claude family (Haiku vs Opus).
How do I govern this?
Single pane for access control, permissions, and data security. Lots of control over approvals & escalations.
Tool-level permissions plus Console RBAC, SCIM, per-user spend limits, and an Admin API.
How do I govern this?
Single pane for access control, permissions, and data security. Lots of control over approvals & escalations.
Tool-level permissions plus Console RBAC, SCIM, per-user spend limits, and an Admin API.

Switching is easy

You don’t have to rip anything out. Keep Claude models where they shine, and let our team stand up your first business-owned Relevance agents in weeks.

Step 1

Connect Claude Managed Agents to Relevance

Link the tools, data, and Claude models you already use, so Relevance runs alongside your current setup from day one.

Step 1

Connect Claude Managed Agents to Relevance

Link the tools, data, and Claude models you already use, so Relevance runs alongside your current setup from day one.

Step 2

Move your first workflows over

We turn your highest-impact workflows into agents your business teams run, proven against your quality bar, while your engineers keep building where code fits best.

Step 2

Move your first workflows over

We turn your highest-impact workflows into agents your business teams run, proven against your quality bar, while your engineers keep building where code fits best.

Step 3

Expand beyond engineering

With your first agents live, hand the rest to the teams that own the work, from operations to support and finance.

Step 3

Expand beyond engineering

With your first agents live, hand the rest to the teams that own the work, from operations to support and finance.

Built for enterprise teams

Run agents on your real data with the access controls, audit trails, and residency guarantees enterprises require all built in.

AICPASOC 2TYPE II
SOC 2
GDPR
GDPR

Security & data privacy

  • Data residency
  • PII masking
  • Audit logs
  • No training on your data

Access & controls

  • Role-based access control
  • SSO / SAML
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals
  • Version control

Monitoring & oversight

  • Real-time monitoring
  • Full agent tracing
  • Cost visibility
  • OTEL & Delta Share export
KPMG
"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."

Levi Watters

Partner, KPMG Australia

Read more
Autodesk
"The key for us was how we can modularize industry knowledge and the best playbooks, and apply it."

Allen Roh

Senior Marketing Manager, Autodesk

Read more
Canva
"We're looking for every place where AI can allow sellers and customer success reps to be more engaged with customers."

Rob Giglio

Chief Customer Officer, Canva

Read more
"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."

Levi Watters

Partner, KPMG Australia

Read more

Relevance AI vs Claude Managed Agents: FAQ

Can't find the answer here? Contact our support team.

See Relevance AI on your own workflows

We partner with enterprise teams to build agents proven against your quality bar and live in weeks. Bring one workflow and compare for yourself.