Relevance AI vs Clay
Clay builds and enriches your GTM lists. Relevance AI runs agents that act on that data end to end, and staffs every team beyond GTM.
Which platform fits your team
Both are good tools. The right one depends on the shape of your work.
A go-to-market data workspace: build tables, enrich them from 150+ providers, and run outbound at scale.
Your work lives in GTM tables: list building, enrichment, and outbound campaigns.
You want waterfall enrichment across 100+ data providers.
Your revenue team needs a data workspace more than an agent workforce.
An AI workforce platform: run specialist agents across every team, from GTM to support, ops, and finance.
Your work spans every team, not just go-to-market.
You want agents that do the work end to end, not just enrich the data behind it.
You need an agent workforce more than a data workspace.
Where Relevance AI is different
Every team, not just GTM
Outside GTM, Clay’s agents can’t help. Relevance staffs every team.
Measure and optimize agent ROI
After launch, Clay shows where agents run and what they cost, but not whether their output stays right. Relevance tracks every live run, so you can prove and improve agent quality and ROI.
Agents in parallel, not table workflows
Clay now chains multi-step table workflows. Relevance orchestrates work with agents nested and running in parallel, beyond any single table.
Enrichment takes judgment, not just a waterfall
The same inbound lead Clay would enrich, taken further: the agent confirms which company it really is, weighs the signals into an intent call, and routes it without opening a duplicate.
New demo request from Alex at Northwind. Enriching the account before it hits a rep, and deciding whether it earns the fast lane.
Two companies go by Northwind. The domain and the careers page point to the B2B logistics one, not the games studio. Using that.
Series B in March, headcount up 38% this year, and they already run a competing tool. Real fit with real intent.
There is already an open opportunity here, owned by Dana. Not creating a duplicate lead on top of it.
How the platforms compare
Both let business users build agents. The difference is scope: Clay agents live inside GTM tables, Relevance AI runs an AI workforce across every team.
Switching is easy
You don’t have to rip anything out. Keep Clay for the GTM data it’s great at, and let our team stand up your first Relevance agents in weeks.
Connect Clay to Relevance
Link the tools and data you already use, Clay included, so Relevance runs alongside your current stack from day one.
Connect Clay to Relevance
Link the tools and data you already use, Clay included, so Relevance runs alongside your current stack from day one.
Move your first workflows over
We turn your highest-impact workflows into agents, proven against your quality bar, while Clay keeps doing what it does best.
Move your first workflows over
We turn your highest-impact workflows into agents, proven against your quality bar, while Clay keeps doing what it does best.
Expand beyond enrichment
With your first agents live, staff the rest of your teams, from support to operations and finance.
Expand beyond enrichment
With your first agents live, staff the rest of your teams, from support to operations and finance.
Built for enterprise teams
Run agents on your real data with the access controls, audit trails, and residency guarantees enterprises require all built in.
Security & data privacy
- Data residency
- PII masking
- Audit logs
- No training on your data
Access & controls
- Role-based access control
- SSO / SAML
- Human-in-the-loop approvals
- Version control
Monitoring & oversight
- Real-time monitoring
- Full agent tracing
- Cost visibility
- OTEL & Delta Share export

"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."
Levi Watters
Partner, KPMG Australia
"The key for us was how we can modularize industry knowledge and the best playbooks, and apply it."
Allen Roh
Senior Marketing Manager, Autodesk
"We're looking for every place where AI can allow sellers and customer success reps to be more engaged with customers."
Rob Giglio
Chief Customer Officer, Canva
"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."
Levi Watters
Partner, KPMG Australia
Relevance AI vs Clay: FAQ
Can't find the answer here? Contact our support team.
See Relevance AI on your own workflows
We partner with enterprise teams to build agents proven against your quality bar and live in weeks. Bring one workflow and compare for yourself.


