Relevance AI
Relevance AI
Relevance AIvs

Relevance AI vs Dust

Dust is built for lots of simple agents your team can chat with. Relevance AI builds those in minutes too, then goes further: orchestrated agents that run whole workflows and keep optimizing them.

Which platform fits your team

Both are good tools. The right one depends on the shape of your work.

Dust

A multiplayer AI workspace: connect your company knowledge, then give every team simple agents they can chat with in the app, in Slack, and in the browser.

  • You want lots of simple agents, quickly, for every team to chat with.

  • The work is mostly answers out of company knowledge: Slack, Notion, Drive, and docs.

  • Simple chat agents are your only use case, so a workforce platform is more than you need.

Relevance AI

An AI workforce platform: a chat app and a builder for simple agents, plus the orchestration to turn them into workflows that run end to end and improve on every run.

  • Chat agents are the start, not the end: you also need several agents running in sequence and in parallel.

  • The work runs through systems of record: CRM, marketing, billing, and ticketing, not only documents.

  • You need the workflow to keep improving, with evals and monitoring on every run.

Where Relevance AI is different

Coordinator
ResearchScored
DraftRouted
96% passing
Regression caught before it shipped

Orchestrated workflows, not single agents

Dust agents call sub-agents inside a conversation, four levels deep. Relevance orchestrates agents in parallel streams across a whole workflow, so the work doesn’t stop at the edge of a chat.

Workflows that optimize themselves

A Dust agent stays as good as the prompt you last wrote. Relevance scores every live run against your quality bar and feeds that back into the agents, so the workflow improves instead of drifting.

Runs the process, not just the answer

Dust’s center of gravity is your knowledge: connect Slack, Notion, and Drive, then ask. Relevance agents work in the systems the process actually lives in, across 1,000+ native connectors.

Knowing the policy is not the same as applying it

The kind of question a simple chat agent answers out of your policy docs, run all the way out instead: the agent checks the account’s real numbers, applies the approval matrix, and escalates the one call it should not make itself.

Approval request · Meridian Freight renewal, 22% off
Deal Desk Analyst

A rep is asking for 22% off the Meridian Freight renewal to close it this quarter. Checking what policy allows, and what the account actually justifies.

Reading the discount policy and approval matrix3s

A rep can sign off 15%. Above that it needs the VP, unless it is a multi-year commitment, which allows up to 25% with deal desk sign-off.

Pulling the opportunity: term, ARR & renewal date2s

It is a 12 month renewal, not multi-year, so the exception that would cover 22% does not apply as the deal is written.

Checking product usage over the last two quarters4s

92% of seats are active and usage is climbing. This is not a churn save, the discount is being asked for speed.

Reading the last renewal call3s

On that call the buyer offered a two year commitment for a better rate. That path is inside policy at this discount, and worth more than a cheaper single year.

Checking prior approved exceptions on the account2s

They already had a 10% exception last renewal. Stacking a second one on a one year term would set the floor for every renewal after this.

Escalating to deal desk with the recommendation1s
Meridian Freight asked for 22% on a 12 month renewal. A rep can approve 15%, and the multi-year exception does not apply to a single year term, so I did not approve it. Usage is healthy at 92% of seats active, and on the last call the buyer offered a two year commitment, which is inside policy at this rate. I escalated to deal desk with that counter and the account’s exception history attached.

How the platforms compare

Both give business users a chat app and simple agents they can build in minutes. The difference is the ceiling: Dust is built around lots of simple agents a team chats with, Relevance AI is built for orchestrated agents that run an entire workflow and optimize it run after run.

Relevance AI
Dust
Relevance AI
Dust
Who manages agents day-to-day?
Your ops and revenue teams — the people closest to the work. We have dashboards and tooling designed specifically for agent management.
Anyone in the workspace builds and edits agents in a no-code builder, with shared skills so one team’s improvements spread to the rest. The shape is many simple agents per team rather than a managed workforce.
Who manages agents day-to-day?
Your ops and revenue teams — the people closest to the work. We have dashboards and tooling designed specifically for agent management.
Anyone in the workspace builds and edits agents in a no-code builder, with shared skills so one team’s improvements spread to the rest. The shape is many simple agents per team rather than a managed workforce.
Who owns agent quality?
Domain experts, with pre-deployment scenarios, production checks, and monitoring they can manage themselves.
Workspace analytics cover adoption and usage: messages, active users, top agents, tool and skill usage, with CSV and API export. Output quality is still judged by reading conversations, with deeper in-product observability on their roadmap rather than shipped.
Who owns agent quality?
Domain experts, with pre-deployment scenarios, production checks, and monitoring they can manage themselves.
Workspace analytics cover adoption and usage: messages, active users, top agents, tool and skill usage, with CSV and API export. Output quality is still judged by reading conversations, with deeper in-product observability on their roadmap rather than shipped.
How do agents receive tasks?
Native triggers for CRMs, email, calendar, and more. Plus webhooks, cron, and the ability to build custom triggers in platform.
Schedules described in plain language plus webhook triggers, with built-in event support for GitHub, Jira, and Zendesk, and everything else through custom webhooks or Zapier, Make, and n8n.
How do agents receive tasks?
Native triggers for CRMs, email, calendar, and more. Plus webhooks, cron, and the ability to build custom triggers in platform.
Schedules described in plain language plus webhook triggers, with built-in event support for GitHub, Jira, and Zendesk, and everything else through custom webhooks or Zapier, Make, and n8n.
What can my agents access?
1,000+ native connectors plus MCP support and the ability to build custom connectors.
20+ native connectors for knowledge sources like Slack, Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, and GitHub, plus 40+ built-in tools. Systems of record beyond that list arrive through MCP.
What can my agents access?
1,000+ native connectors plus MCP support and the ability to build custom connectors.
20+ native connectors for knowledge sources like Slack, Notion, Google Drive, Confluence, and GitHub, plus 40+ built-in tools. Systems of record beyond that list arrive through MCP.
How much can I tune performance?
Full orchestration with parallel streams, deep nesting, evals, and production monitoring — all GA.
Real sub-agent delegation: agents call other agents as tools, up to four levels deep, on a Temporal-backed runtime. Orchestration stays scoped to the conversation, without parallel agent streams or evals feeding the tuning.
How much can I tune performance?
Full orchestration with parallel streams, deep nesting, evals, and production monitoring — all GA.
Real sub-agent delegation: agents call other agents as tools, up to four levels deep, on a Temporal-backed runtime. Orchestration stays scoped to the conversation, without parallel agent streams or evals feeding the tuning.
How much can I control cost?
Full. Route to any model provider and optimize cost per agent, per task.
Route each agent to Claude, GPT, Gemini, or Mistral. Licensing is per seat with monthly credits per seat, so spend tracks headcount and credit packs rather than the work the agents do.
How much can I control cost?
Full. Route to any model provider and optimize cost per agent, per task.
Route each agent to Claude, GPT, Gemini, or Mistral. Licensing is per seat with monthly credits per seat, so spend tracks headcount and credit packs rather than the work the agents do.
How do I govern this?
Single pane for access control, permissions, and data security. Lots of control over approvals & escalations.
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR with EU or US data residency, and HIPAA-ready deployment, with SSO, SCIM, audit logs, and Spaces-based permissions that agents inherit. SCIM, audit logs, and single-tenant deployment are Enterprise-only.
How do I govern this?
Single pane for access control, permissions, and data security. Lots of control over approvals & escalations.
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR with EU or US data residency, and HIPAA-ready deployment, with SSO, SCIM, audit logs, and Spaces-based permissions that agents inherit. SCIM, audit logs, and single-tenant deployment are Enterprise-only.

Switching is easy

You don’t have to rip anything out. Keep Dust for the simple agents it’s good at, and let our team stand up your first orchestrated workflows in weeks.

Step 1

Connect Dust to Relevance

Link the tools and data you already use, Dust included, so Relevance runs alongside your current stack from day one.

Step 1

Connect Dust to Relevance

Link the tools and data you already use, Dust included, so Relevance runs alongside your current stack from day one.

Step 2

Move your first workflows over

We turn your highest-impact processes into orchestrated agents, proven against your quality bar, while Dust keeps serving the chat agents your team already uses.

Step 2

Move your first workflows over

We turn your highest-impact processes into orchestrated agents, proven against your quality bar, while Dust keeps serving the chat agents your team already uses.

Step 3

Expand beyond company Q&A

With your first agents live, staff the rest of your teams, from revenue and marketing operations to support and finance.

Step 3

Expand beyond company Q&A

With your first agents live, staff the rest of your teams, from revenue and marketing operations to support and finance.

Built for enterprise teams

Run agents on your real data with the access controls, audit trails, and residency guarantees enterprises require all built in.

AICPASOC 2TYPE II
SOC 2
GDPR
GDPR

Security & data privacy

  • Data residency
  • PII masking
  • Audit logs
  • No training on your data

Access & controls

  • Role-based access control
  • SSO / SAML
  • Human-in-the-loop approvals
  • Version control

Monitoring & oversight

  • Real-time monitoring
  • Full agent tracing
  • Cost visibility
  • OTEL & Delta Share export
KPMG
"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."

Levi Watters

Partner, KPMG Australia

Read more
Autodesk
"The key for us was how we can modularize industry knowledge and the best playbooks, and apply it."

Allen Roh

Senior Marketing Manager, Autodesk

Read more
Canva
"We're looking for every place where AI can allow sellers and customer success reps to be more engaged with customers."

Rob Giglio

Chief Customer Officer, Canva

Read more
"The ability to be vendor agnostic and the ability to scale across a breadth of functions is a really key feature."

Levi Watters

Partner, KPMG Australia

Read more

Relevance AI vs Dust: FAQ

Can't find the answer here? Contact our support team.

See Relevance AI on your own workflows

We partner with enterprise teams to build agents proven against your quality bar and live in weeks. Bring one process and compare for yourself.